Posts Tagged ‘UK’

UK Music industry targets Google over pirate links

London calling...and demanding you start censoring search results!

As reported by CNet, the British Phonographic Industry (a UK music trade group) has asked Google to remove links to file sharing sites like Megaupload, 4shared, Zippyshare and MediaFire from searches.

"We have identified the following links that are available via Google’s search engine," the BPI wrote to Google in a June 11 letter, a copy of which was obtained by the Chilling Effects Clearinghouse. "[BPI leaders] request the following links be removed as soon as possible, as they directly link to sound recordings owned by our members."

The BPI has asked Google to remove individual links in the past, and Google will comply at times. Typically they do not edit their search engine results, though.

What’s interesting to note is that many of the biggest UK music labels don’t agree with the BPI’s latest move. With Google heading towards starting up its own online music store, the labels hope that it will become a legitimate business rival to iTunes and Apple’s dominance over digital music. They don’t want any interference with Google and music to come in to play in the lead up to the Google Music launch.

This also marks one of the first times that any media company has actually gone after a search engine in any way when it comes to links to pirated material. Normally, they focus on file sharing and torrent sites, ignoring the fact that using a search engine to seek out those downloads is the way many people find them in the first place.

  • Share/Bookmark

UK passes Digital Economy Bill

Pip pip, cheerio, pass the crisps!

In a session that was attended about as well as your average Tripe Fair would be (actually, we are talking about the British here…hmmm…), the House of Commons has passed the Digital Economy Bill. 

It was passed in a session that could be politely described as ‘not well attended’ late Wednesday night, passing two votes on its content and receiving a third reading that is required to gain royal assent and become law.

Removed during the debate on the bill was clause 18, which would have granted the High Court extensive powers to force ISPs to block access to any online location if a ‘substantial portion’ of the location infringed on copyright (with ISPs also forced to pay all court fees accrued in bringing the case to court in the first place). It was somewhat replaced by an earlier, reworded clause :

The new clause allows the secretary of state for business to order the blocking of "a location on the internet which the court is satisfied has been, is being or is likely to be used for or in connection with an activity that infringes copyright".

The problem with that as it’s worded is that it could impact the ability of whistleblowers to release suppressed information, since whatever government body or corporation that was suppressing it in the first place could claim that its release infringed on their copyright. The entire whistleblower website could then technically be ordered blocked by the government, regardless of whether or not the information released was beneficial to the public.

As well, copyright holders can still send ‘copyright infringement reports’ to an ISP, with that ISP then required to pass it along to the accused. ISPs are also required to pass along lists of all suspected infringement to copyright holders on request. There is also a clause allowing for speed blocks, site blocking, account suspensions and bandwidth shaping against individual users suspected of illegal downloading. ISPs failing to go along with these rulings can be fined up to 250,000 pounds per incident.

Among many other clauses (which are listed on The Guardian’s site here), the PEGI game ratings system is now officially recognized as the UK’s lone rating system for games.

  • Share/Bookmark
Easy AdSense by Unreal