Posts Tagged ‘Microsoft’

Microsoft indicates possible company push for PC gaming

Through the closing of Age of Empires developers Ensemble Studios to the focus on content for the Xbox 360, Microsoft has not exactly been at the forefront of pushing the PC forward as a gaming platform in recent years. That may be about to change.

Kotaku has obtained a copy of an internal Microsoft document that indicates a possible shift towards PC gaming. In a Q&A that’s part of this document, Microsoft addresses whether Fable III being brought to the PC platform is the beginning of a change in business philosophy.

Q: Does "Fable III" on Windows signal a larger reinvestment by Microsoft in PC gaming? How is this different from the previous times you’ve announced a reinvestment in PC gaming and not quite come through with a robust offering?

There definitely have been previous announcements of a new PC push by Microsoft that have turned out to be nothing but the sound of crickets.

A: In terms of revenue, Windows is far and away the largest gaming platform in the world, so it’s an incredibly important part of Microsoft’s business. From core games like "Fable III" to casual, social and Facebook titles, more gaming happens on Windows than anywhere else. Windows 7 is a world-class gaming platform, and you can bet Microsoft has a vested interest in using it as a platform for amazing first party content. "Fable III" on Windows as well as Xbox 360 this holiday is a great first step, and we’ll have more news for you later this summer.

So, Microsoft does acknowledge the profit potential of game releases on Windows PC’s. I wonder if maybe Fable III is being used as a bit of a test bed to see what the response is like to the PC version announcement?

Hopefully this isn’t just more empty words from Microsoft.

  • Share/Bookmark

Google, Yahoo and Microsoft breaking European privacy laws

  

According to WP29 (the European Commission’s Article 29 Data Protection Working Party advisory body…I love these short names!), the search engines from Google, Yahoo and Microsoft don’t comply with the EU’s Data Protection Directive.

That directive requires businesses and governments to protect private citizens from having personal information collected, used or disclosed. The issue with regard to Google, Yahoo and Bing are the search data retention policies used by the search engines. The original complaint was made in April of 2008, when it was concluded that search engine data retention does come under the Data Protection Directive, and wasn’t up to par for EU policy. The EU wants data, including user IP addresses and searches, kept no longer than 6 months after their use.

From the EFF :

At the time, Google announced that it would anonymize IP addresses in its server logs after nine months, instead of the previous 18-24 months. Since then, Google has indicated that in practice it deletes the last octet of collected IP addresses. Google retains other information, like cookies, for a period of 18 months. Yahoo announced that it would anonymize user log data, page views, clicks, ad views, and ad clicks within 90 days of collection, with limited exceptions for fraud, security, and legal obligations. Yahoo also announced that it would delete full IP addresses, rather than deleting merely the last octet. And this year, Microsoft announced that it will delete IP addresses associated with search queries six months after their collection, a reduction form the previous practice of retaining that data for 18 months. Microsoft’s announced data retention policy goes further by endorsing "de-identification" (separation of search queries and account information, as well as anonymization of cookie information) as soon as a Bing search query is received. After 18 months, Microsoft then deletes cookie information, and any other cross-session IDs associated with the search query.

In response to those initial changes, WP29 told Yahoo that partial deletion of personal data in search logs doesn’t make for true anonymization of the user. Google were told that deleting only the last octet of an IP address is insufficient in guaranteeing user anonymity. Finally, MS and Google were asked to review their retention policy and bring it in line with the maximum of 6 months the EU desires.

The short version : The EU wants Google, Yahoo and Bing to start getting rid of any and all personal data kept from user searches after a maximum of 6 months. They also want less information kept from the beginning, and that information kept truly secure and anonymous.

  • Share/Bookmark

Microsoft expanding Games on Demand online store

While Games for Windows Live has been around for awhile now, the Games on Demand side of it is still relatively new. That part of the service is being expanded.

Microsoft has announced that they will now be carrying games on their Games on Demand marketplace that don’t use Games for Windows Live. Until this point, only titles utilizing GfWL were sold through the store.

The first additions to the catalogue that don’t actually use GfWL : Age of Empires III Complete, Splinter Cell : Conviction, S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Shadow of Chernobyl, Max Payne 2, Borderlands, Assassin’s Creed 2 and Grand Theft Auto : San Andreas. Also, Prince of Persia : The Forgotten Sands, and two earlier games in the PoP series : The Sands of Time and Warrior Within, both of which are marked down.

So it seems that Microsoft is getting serious about PC digital retail. What’s yet to be determined is whether or not they’ve waited too long to really jump on board.

  • Share/Bookmark

Netflix expanding use of PlayReady DRM

According to a joint press release issued today, Netflix will begin using Microsoft’s PlayReady DRM on all Netflix devices and applications. The DRM will cover streaming and physical Netflix copies.

“Netflix ready devices are a popular way for our members to instantly watch the huge library of TV episodes and movies available from Netflix that can be watched instantly on their TVs,” said Bill Holmes, vice president of business development at Netflix. “Netflix is expanding our investment in PlayReady and making PlayReady our primary DRM technology because it best meets the requirements of our content suppliers and device partners while allowing us to benefit from efficiencies in our content delivery infrastructure.”

From the facts pages about PlayReady, it certainly seems to offer a lot of options…it can be used on rentals, pay per view or purchase and subscription models. Since the license information is actually embedded within the content itself, transferring that content between devices shouldn’t present a problem either.

All in all, it sounds like a reasonable system. How it will turn out in practice we’ll soon find out.

EAVB_TOZEXIQJGB

  • Share/Bookmark

Privacy laws they need a changin’

Privacy

If you’ve never heard of Digital Due Process its not a surprise, however what is a surprise is who is behind it. I am sure you’ve heard of Google, Microsoft, Intel, eBay, AT&T, ACLU, Americans for Tax Reform, and many others. This crosses political boundaries as well, its not a red vs blue, liberal vs conservative, republican vs democrat, communism vs socialism, or fork vs spoon.

Now what is this all about? Online privacy. Basically these companies want the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) to be rewritten. The ECPA was written in 1986 and hasn’t changed since, while technology has changed dramatically. Here is a video to explain the idea behind this.

Its pretty basic and easy to understand. Its basically taking our 4th Amendment Rights and making sure they apply to our online world and our private information stored there. With cloud computing, where our information is stored online rather than on our computer’s hard drives, getting a larger and larger presence in today’s technology, this is something that does need to change.

Now this would only stop the government from peeking at your information online, this will not stop your employer from actively searching out your internet activity.

  • Share/Bookmark

Businesses Facing the Wrath of the Software Auditor

Often times, home PC users and gamers seem to adopt a bit of an attitude of “Why are these big software companies always coming after me?” And the answer from a lot of businesses would be something akin to “Get over yourself, sweetheart. You aren’t alone.”

Yes, as the economy has taken a downward turn, it seems that software company auditors are launching a full court press to exploit every single fine print loophole in contracts with businesses in order to drum up further license sales.

Software auditors are the guys who go in to businesses with whom their firms have contracts and ensure that those contracts are being followed to the letter. That includes making sure that every single copy of software made by that developer that is in use at those businesses has actually been licensed from the developer. They’re also checking for any product usage that falls outside the agreement signed between the companies.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Microsoft Patents Peer-to-Peer DRM System

According to Cryptopatents, MS has indeed patented a system that would allow users to make use of a peer to peer bit torrent network to download commercial software legally. That network would include several forms of encryption covering the entire network, as well as each individual data packet involved in the torrent download.

From the Cryptopatents article :

Microsoft’s permutation of this method is to individually encrypt each packet using several layers of encryption: public key cryptography, DES and RC4 for the algorithm’s different components.  The final encrypted packet is distributed to the network.

In an ideal setting, the scheme works like this: Microsoft sends you a master key that has been enciphered with your public key.  You decrypt the master key and the result is hashed using SHA.  The output is split in two, with the first part used as the root of the machine authentication code key (MAC, similar to a checksum), the second is the DES key. The DES key is used to decrypt the RC4 content key that, in turn, is used to decrypt the content payload.   The whole thing is XOR’d with the MAC and the output is reassembled for your viewing pleasure.

And yes, if that read like a giant paragraph of “Was that English?!”, welcome to the club. Essentially, how it seems the network encryption basically works is that you would receive an access key at the time of purchase. That key would ‘unlock’ torrent access, each piece of which is encrypted on its own. So even if one piece of the torrent were cracked, that still leaves dozens, maybe hundreds, of others to work on. It probably, like any other DRM system, isn’t uncrackable, but it would certainly take a substantial time investment on the part of hackers to do so. And since most software companies are using DRM to really try to avoid piracy over the initial launch period of a product, this would likely fit the bill.

On another note, it certainly is nice to see a commercial entity realizing that bit torrent doesn’t have to be left in the hands of the pirate community, and can actually be beneficial in a legal setting.

  • Share/Bookmark
Easy AdSense by Unreal