Posts Tagged ‘Google’

FCC holding closed-door talks with corporations over possible net neutrality compromise

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the top officers at the FCC are holding closed door negotiations with lobbyists representing ISP’s, including AT&T and Verizon, as well as Google and Skype. The reason for those meetings is discussion of a compromise that would give the government agency authority over Internet rules, while also bending enough that the media companies are willing to accept an agreement.

The only way to get legislation this year is for Internet providers and tech companies like Google to reach a compromise, one person involved with the FCC meetings said, adding, "Even that is really, really hard."

This news has not exactly been met with much enthusiasm from public interest groups, none of whom were invited to any of these sessions.

"For a president who talks big about transparency and that ‘he’ll take a back seat to nobody on net neutrality,’ it’s inexcusable that his FCC is brokering backroom deals between industry lobbyists with nary a public interest representative in the room," said Josh Silver, executive director of Free Press, a public interest group.

"This secretive process is especially unseemly for what is supposed to have been the most transparent FCC in history," the Media Access Project’s Andrew Schwartzman chimed in just a few minutes ago.

The problem is that with everything being done in such a secretive manner, there is no way for anyone to know what exactly is on the table in terms of compromises made to the media corporations. That’s an especially big issue for an FCC that has made claims and promises of transparency and openness during any and all negotiations over net neutrality.

Beyond the FCC, it seems that similar secretive negotiations are happening between the same lobby groups and the Senate Commerce Committee. The talks will not be open to the press, and there is no indication that any consumer groups will be in attendance.

(The original WSJ article is behind a subscriber paywall, but can be found and read in full via Google. Thanks also to Ars Technica).

  • Share/Bookmark

UK Music industry targets Google over pirate links

London calling...and demanding you start censoring search results!

As reported by CNet, the British Phonographic Industry (a UK music trade group) has asked Google to remove links to file sharing sites like Megaupload, 4shared, Zippyshare and MediaFire from searches.

"We have identified the following links that are available via Google’s search engine," the BPI wrote to Google in a June 11 letter, a copy of which was obtained by the Chilling Effects Clearinghouse. "[BPI leaders] request the following links be removed as soon as possible, as they directly link to sound recordings owned by our members."

The BPI has asked Google to remove individual links in the past, and Google will comply at times. Typically they do not edit their search engine results, though.

What’s interesting to note is that many of the biggest UK music labels don’t agree with the BPI’s latest move. With Google heading towards starting up its own online music store, the labels hope that it will become a legitimate business rival to iTunes and Apple’s dominance over digital music. They don’t want any interference with Google and music to come in to play in the lead up to the Google Music launch.

This also marks one of the first times that any media company has actually gone after a search engine in any way when it comes to links to pirated material. Normally, they focus on file sharing and torrent sites, ignoring the fact that using a search engine to seek out those downloads is the way many people find them in the first place.

  • Share/Bookmark

Google preparing music store, possibly for Fall launch

Seeing the success that Apple and Amazon (amongst others) have had with digital music, Google is apparently prepping a launch in to the same waters this Fall. Their music store will offer both downloaded songs and streaming music, according to Cnet.

While part of the basis behind such a move would obviously be to help convince consumers to buy and use use Android phones with a Google music application, their overall target market seems to be broader than that.

Part of the reason Google feels they can make inroads in the digital music market is the widespread popularity of their search engine. They could easily build in functions that would allow a song title search to bring up results on the music streaming system, with a link to buy the song also on the page. With their purchase of Simplify Media a few months back, Google also has a company on board who helped let computer users stream their iTunes and WinAmp libraries to other web devices, possibly enabling them to beat iTunes to the bunch with a cloud service.

  • Share/Bookmark

Apple officially being investigated by FTC over mobile practices

All your apps are belong to us!

As reported by the Huffington Post, the FTC has decided to go ahead and launch a full scale investigation in to Apple’s business practices in the mobile market. This is an escalation from some probes the Justice Department has previously had in to various business dealings by Apple. In fact, it seems that Justice and the FTC  have been haggling over which agency will head up the investigation.

Apple’s policy of restricting software licensing to certain companies is at the heart of the investigation. Google, for example, has been very vocal in protests that their AdMob advertising service being blocked (and essentially cutting out any Google advertising from the iPhone and iPad platforms) is anti-competition.

  • Share/Bookmark

Google, Yahoo and Microsoft breaking European privacy laws

  

According to WP29 (the European Commission’s Article 29 Data Protection Working Party advisory body…I love these short names!), the search engines from Google, Yahoo and Microsoft don’t comply with the EU’s Data Protection Directive.

That directive requires businesses and governments to protect private citizens from having personal information collected, used or disclosed. The issue with regard to Google, Yahoo and Bing are the search data retention policies used by the search engines. The original complaint was made in April of 2008, when it was concluded that search engine data retention does come under the Data Protection Directive, and wasn’t up to par for EU policy. The EU wants data, including user IP addresses and searches, kept no longer than 6 months after their use.

From the EFF :

At the time, Google announced that it would anonymize IP addresses in its server logs after nine months, instead of the previous 18-24 months. Since then, Google has indicated that in practice it deletes the last octet of collected IP addresses. Google retains other information, like cookies, for a period of 18 months. Yahoo announced that it would anonymize user log data, page views, clicks, ad views, and ad clicks within 90 days of collection, with limited exceptions for fraud, security, and legal obligations. Yahoo also announced that it would delete full IP addresses, rather than deleting merely the last octet. And this year, Microsoft announced that it will delete IP addresses associated with search queries six months after their collection, a reduction form the previous practice of retaining that data for 18 months. Microsoft’s announced data retention policy goes further by endorsing "de-identification" (separation of search queries and account information, as well as anonymization of cookie information) as soon as a Bing search query is received. After 18 months, Microsoft then deletes cookie information, and any other cross-session IDs associated with the search query.

In response to those initial changes, WP29 told Yahoo that partial deletion of personal data in search logs doesn’t make for true anonymization of the user. Google were told that deleting only the last octet of an IP address is insufficient in guaranteeing user anonymity. Finally, MS and Google were asked to review their retention policy and bring it in line with the maximum of 6 months the EU desires.

The short version : The EU wants Google, Yahoo and Bing to start getting rid of any and all personal data kept from user searches after a maximum of 6 months. They also want less information kept from the beginning, and that information kept truly secure and anonymous.

  • Share/Bookmark

Walmart and Google get further in to games

Yesterday it was Best Buy and Target, today it’s Walmart and Google. Apparently there’s money in this whole gaming thing the kids are in to…

Beware the dangers of falling prices!

Walmart is getting serious about diving in to game sales, launching their new Gamecenter website earlier today.

Gamecenter serves as an online store, and also offers game previews, developer interviews, and publisher promotions. Walmart is also going to allow customers to trade is video games and consoles online in exchange for prepaid Walmart Visa cards. Walmart will pay all associated shipping costs for those exchanges.

Google has announced the Chrome Web Store, which will be opened later this year.

While Chrome users will be able to create shortcuts for apps access and the like, since everything sold on the store will consist of general web applications, all will run just fine for anyone using a different OS.

Some of the icons noticeable in the example picture of Web Store products are Lego Star Wars and Plants vs. Zombies. Google has made moves to get involved in gaming before this, and they’ve clearly decided that the distribution side is the way to go.

  • Share/Bookmark

Google moving in to gaming realm?

It certainly appears that way, with Mark DeLoura starting work as Google’s developer advocate for games. Add this to such endeavours as Google Android and issuing their own open source 3D API, and it certainly looks like another giant company is dipping a toe in to the gaming industry waters. DeLoura was a lead engineer at Nintendo, the VP of Technology at GreenScreen Interactive, then moved on to executive jobs with Ubisoft and Sony Computer Entertainment. He’s also the ex Editor-in-chief of Game Developer magazine, and has spent the past 3 years doing technology consulting work and writing.

“I personally feel that Google hiring someone specifically to focus on games is a signal from the company that they recognize the growing importance of games as a medium,” said DeLoura in a statement to Gamasutra.

He continued, “In this time of great disruption in the game industry, there are a huge number of opportunities for developers. It can be difficult for traditional games companies to navigate the new possibilities provided by mobile platforms, social networks, and alternative business models. I’m looking forward to working with both traditional games companies and new game developers to talk about how Google can help, and the platforms and projects Google is working on.”

The fact that major corporations like Google are showing an interest in joining the games industry just reinforces how big that industry is becoming. And if they can help support some of the smaller independent developers out there and assist them in getting their product out, all the better.

  • Share/Bookmark

Privacy laws they need a changin’

Privacy

If you’ve never heard of Digital Due Process its not a surprise, however what is a surprise is who is behind it. I am sure you’ve heard of Google, Microsoft, Intel, eBay, AT&T, ACLU, Americans for Tax Reform, and many others. This crosses political boundaries as well, its not a red vs blue, liberal vs conservative, republican vs democrat, communism vs socialism, or fork vs spoon.

Now what is this all about? Online privacy. Basically these companies want the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) to be rewritten. The ECPA was written in 1986 and hasn’t changed since, while technology has changed dramatically. Here is a video to explain the idea behind this.

Its pretty basic and easy to understand. Its basically taking our 4th Amendment Rights and making sure they apply to our online world and our private information stored there. With cloud computing, where our information is stored online rather than on our computer’s hard drives, getting a larger and larger presence in today’s technology, this is something that does need to change.

Now this would only stop the government from peeking at your information online, this will not stop your employer from actively searching out your internet activity.

  • Share/Bookmark

Google launches 1gbps fiber trial

google

Google made a major announcement today that could change the speed of internet in the US, if it succeeds.

Google is planning to build, and test ultra-high speed broadband networks in a small number of trial locations across the country. We’ll deliver Internet speeds more than 100 times faster than what most Americans have access to today with 1 gigabit per second, fiber-to-the-home connections. We’ll offer service at a competitive price to at least 50,000, and potentially up to 500,000 people.

This is really good news. The US had been passed by on internet speeds, mostly because there is little competition for ISPs. Sometimes there is only one provider for a city, and the reality is that ISPs are quite happy with the way things are. Thus far they have not changed to newer, faster and cheaper networks simply because the profits on what they offer now are higher than what they would be if they upgraded. On the other hand, countries like Japan have had faster internet than the US for awhile now available for a lot cheaper.

If you remember, last year the town of Monticello, MN was sued by the ISP Bridgewater because the town wanted to add a ultra high speed internet service. Well the ISP lost. I wonder what the ISPs are going to do about Google? This is pretty much the same thing Monticello did. We’ll have to keep an eye out, as I do not think the big ISP companies are going to like this.

If you want your city to be included in the Google trials, sign up here.

  • Share/Bookmark

Cloud Computing : Convenience & Privacy Concerns

So, I guess I get to be the one starting this whole project off. Um…yay?

While the main focus of this site is going to be concerned with DRM issues, we are also going to branch out and cover other technology-related topics as well, just like this one.

Cloud computing. You’ve probably heard of it, and chances are you’ve actually done it (though you may not realize it). First off, let’s cover what it is.

That image (which I’ve taken from here) gives a pretty good idea of what the concept actually consists of. Basically, a multitude of services and devices all drawing from a central ‘cloud’ (also known as ‘The Internet’). Still sounds like something futuristic, something you’ve never utilized? Think again.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark
Easy AdSense by Unreal