Posts Tagged ‘file sharing’

UK Music industry targets Google over pirate links

London calling...and demanding you start censoring search results!

As reported by CNet, the British Phonographic Industry (a UK music trade group) has asked Google to remove links to file sharing sites like Megaupload, 4shared, Zippyshare and MediaFire from searches.

"We have identified the following links that are available via Google’s search engine," the BPI wrote to Google in a June 11 letter, a copy of which was obtained by the Chilling Effects Clearinghouse. "[BPI leaders] request the following links be removed as soon as possible, as they directly link to sound recordings owned by our members."

The BPI has asked Google to remove individual links in the past, and Google will comply at times. Typically they do not edit their search engine results, though.

What’s interesting to note is that many of the biggest UK music labels don’t agree with the BPI’s latest move. With Google heading towards starting up its own online music store, the labels hope that it will become a legitimate business rival to iTunes and Apple’s dominance over digital music. They don’t want any interference with Google and music to come in to play in the lead up to the Google Music launch.

This also marks one of the first times that any media company has actually gone after a search engine in any way when it comes to links to pirated material. Normally, they focus on file sharing and torrent sites, ignoring the fact that using a search engine to seek out those downloads is the way many people find them in the first place.

  • Share/Bookmark

Winning essay argues for file sharing

An essay titled ‘Is it OK to download music, movies and games without paying?’, was chosen as the winner in an event sponsored by The Centre for Professional and Applied Ethics and The Department of Philosophy at the University of Manitoba.

The main argument in the essay is that file sharing benefits society. If you take away the copyright issues and look at the base argument that sharing information benefits society, I think you can successfully argue that point. Almost every invention has been based upon someone else’s work. What if the man who first started a fire sent caveman lawyers (thugs with clubs) to trample other fires? What if he said that if you want to have fire, I have to be paid? We’d probably be sitting cold in a cave still.

I’m not advocating for copyright infringement, file sharing or any other types of illegal behaviour, but we are getting a little out of control with companies enforcing copyright. Yesterday the UVEX sporting supplier web page was updated with a little poem titled ‘Blonde we like wins Downhill (Last name rhymes with "Bonn")’. Why? Because the International Olympic Committee said they could not use a skier’s name, someone who they have sponsored, on their website. They even had to take down old articles with her name included. A little bit of overkill.

Or you may have heard about Google taking down music blogs because of supposed ‘copyright infringement’, even though some of those blogs had permission from the labels to put them up.

You’re reading this right: Five years of Lipold’s labor of love was deleted, in part, because he posted a track with full permission of a label, and the track apparently wasn’t even online by the time the IFPI filed its complaint.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Yes, You Can Make Money Giving Away Songs For Free

Music Energy (+clipping path, XXL)

 

While the RIAA may have you believe that every single file-sharer out there is nothing but a dirty pirate who just wants everything for free, there are some artists and labels out there who embrace the concept of file-sharing and are using it to bump up revenues.

The most noted example is Trent Reznor, the front man for Nine Inch Nails. He has easily made $1.6 million on his last release, all the while giving away his music for free. How has he done this? By connecting with his fans and giving them a reason to buy his albums by offering something unique and at a reasonable price. For example, you can get a two CD set for just $10, or a boxed set for $75, which includes the CDs, a DVD, a Blu-ray, and a photobook. 

Reznor doesn’t worry about licensing or DRM and he’s not busy making enemies of his fans by suing them or calling them pirates and thieves. Instead, he embraces his fans and encourages them to connect with him and each other. Read more about Reznor and other artists like him here.

Now think about the RIAA and pretty much how universally hated they are as an organization. If they would just take a page out of Reznor’s book, they could be laughing all the way to the bank, too.

  • Share/Bookmark

Piracy = Climate Change, Says Music Industry

Ars Technica reports that the IFPI, a music industry group has released its annual report in which it likens copyright infringement with climate change and as such calls on governments around the World to legislate against it.

The report notes that physical CD sales continue to drop  and attributes all of this to piracy, even as it admits that digital music sales went up in 2009. It also failed to mention, as reported here, that file sharers are more likely to purchase digital music and will spend more money on digital music subscription services than non-file sharers.

The IFPI wants governments to enact legislation similar to the three strikes law that will soon go into effect in France. This law will create a new agency known as HADOPI which will monitor alleged file sharing activities and will cut off access to the Internet for repeat offenders.

  • Share/Bookmark
Easy AdSense by Unreal