Posts Tagged ‘copyright infringement’

UK passes Digital Economy Bill

Pip pip, cheerio, pass the crisps!

In a session that was attended about as well as your average Tripe Fair would be (actually, we are talking about the British here…hmmm…), the House of Commons has passed the Digital Economy Bill. 

It was passed in a session that could be politely described as ‘not well attended’ late Wednesday night, passing two votes on its content and receiving a third reading that is required to gain royal assent and become law.

Removed during the debate on the bill was clause 18, which would have granted the High Court extensive powers to force ISPs to block access to any online location if a ‘substantial portion’ of the location infringed on copyright (with ISPs also forced to pay all court fees accrued in bringing the case to court in the first place). It was somewhat replaced by an earlier, reworded clause :

The new clause allows the secretary of state for business to order the blocking of "a location on the internet which the court is satisfied has been, is being or is likely to be used for or in connection with an activity that infringes copyright".

The problem with that as it’s worded is that it could impact the ability of whistleblowers to release suppressed information, since whatever government body or corporation that was suppressing it in the first place could claim that its release infringed on their copyright. The entire whistleblower website could then technically be ordered blocked by the government, regardless of whether or not the information released was beneficial to the public.

As well, copyright holders can still send ‘copyright infringement reports’ to an ISP, with that ISP then required to pass it along to the accused. ISPs are also required to pass along lists of all suspected infringement to copyright holders on request. There is also a clause allowing for speed blocks, site blocking, account suspensions and bandwidth shaping against individual users suspected of illegal downloading. ISPs failing to go along with these rulings can be fined up to 250,000 pounds per incident.

Among many other clauses (which are listed on The Guardian’s site here), the PEGI game ratings system is now officially recognized as the UK’s lone rating system for games.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tens of thousands targeted in new litigation against alleged movie downloaders

Avast, yet mateys! Bring me yon bad movies!

In the sort of mass litigation previously seen only enacted against European movie downloaders, more than 20,000 alleged movie torrent downloaders have been sued for copyright infringement in Washington D.C. courts. According to the report on The Hollywood Reporter, another lawsuit against 30,000 more people is likely imminent.

The suits are being brought about by US Copyright Group, who describe themselves as :

…a company owned by intellectual property lawyers that has one singular mission and focus: to stop movie copyright infringement and make illegal downloaders pay damages for the content they have stolen. From Washington D.C. to Los Angeles, technology companies and a conglomeration intellectual property law firms work hand-in-hand with each other to end unlawful downloading and illegal file-sharing of films.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Beyonce’s Youtube channel videos taken down by Sony for copyright infringement.

New corporate logo : All your rights are belong to us

Beyonce Knowles…go to her Youtube channel, and you’ll see a big label slapped across the top of it congratulating her for winning 6 Grammies with songs that she wrote. Most of those songs have associated videos. Those videos have been pulled from her channel. Why? They infringed upon copyright. Whose copyright?

That of Sony. Her record label.

Yes indeed, restricted from sharing the video for the song you wrote by your label because they own it. THAT’S how you know you’ve hit the big time, baby!

I’m going to include a screen shot of what is currently displayed when you try to view the video for her song ‘Single Ladies (Put a Ring On It)’ in case Sony gains a clue in short order and allows access to return. Probably not necessary…we ARE talking about the music industry here…but I want to make sure that this ridiculousness is shared for group mockery.

Thanks for making us all that money...we now own your soul

And the music industry wonders why it’s falling hard. Why so many of the artists are turning their backs on the big labels and walking away, middle finger proudly raised in to the air. Why they are increasingly the butt of jokes everywhere.

Good show, music business…good show.

(Thanks to Motherboard for bringing this hilarity to my attention).

  • Share/Bookmark

Australia’s courts rule that ISPs aren’t copyright cops

As reported on Ars Technica, Australia’s Federal Court has made a ruling that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are under no obligation to act on copyright infringement notices passed on to users by media companies. The ruling was handed down today.

The case stems from movie studios being angered when iiNet refused to act upon warning letters sent by the studios to various iiNet customers alleging illegal downloading as a basis for cutting off Internet service to those customers. Instead, iiNet sent the notices on to the police, saying that it was not a legal body capable of determining guilt. The movie studios responded by suing iiNet in 2008 under claims that the ISPs inaction counted as ‘authorizing’ piracy.

iiNet CEO Michael Malone explained that while his company does have a policy of Internet termination for those proven to be infringing upon copyright, the notices he was receiving from the studios were simply alleging infringement. He made similar comments in a 2008 article in ComputerWorld Australia concerning the case :

We have been passing on all those complaints directly on to the state police—who are in our building. They send us a list of IP addresses and say ‘this IP address was involved in a breach on this date.’ We look at that say, ‘Well, what do you want us to do with this? We can’t release the person’s details to you on the basis of an allegation and we can’t go and kick the customer off on the basis of an allegation from someone else.’ So we say, ‘You are alleging the person has broken the law; we’re passing it to the police. Let them deal with it.’

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark
Easy AdSense by Unreal