<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blizzard announces Battle.Net to be required for Starcraft II, details new additions to system UPDATED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 03:03:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can We Please Stop With The Hypocrisy And Gross Oversimplification When It Comes To Drm And Piracy Talk? &#124; newonllingames</title>
		<link>http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Can We Please Stop With The Hypocrisy And Gross Oversimplification When It Comes To Drm And Piracy Talk? &#124; newonllingames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>[...] Internet link are ALSO looking forward to Starcraft 2? You know, the Starcraft 2 that will also require permanent Internet access as it&#8217;s directly interwoven with Blizzard&#8217;s Battle.net client? Ah, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Internet link are ALSO looking forward to Starcraft 2? You know, the Starcraft 2 that will also require permanent Internet access as it&#8217;s directly interwoven with Blizzard&#8217;s Battle.net client? Ah, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Riseborough</title>
		<link>http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Riseborough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the compliment...oh, and commercial link removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the compliment&#8230;oh, and commercial link removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>This is interesting, post about Blizzard more often!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting, post about Blizzard more often!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can we please stop with the hypocrisy and gross oversimplification when it comes to DRM and piracy talk? &#124; DRM News</title>
		<link>http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Can we please stop with the hypocrisy and gross oversimplification when it comes to DRM and piracy talk? &#124; DRM News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] Internet link are ALSO looking forward to Starcraft 2? You know, the Starcraft 2 that will also require permanent Internet access as it’s directly interwoven with Blizzard’s Battle.net client? Ah, the hypocrisy…it’s the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Internet link are ALSO looking forward to Starcraft 2? You know, the Starcraft 2 that will also require permanent Internet access as it’s directly interwoven with Blizzard’s Battle.net client? Ah, the hypocrisy…it’s the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubisoft DRM/Command &#38; Conquer 4 Updates&#8230;both online all the time &#124; DRM News</title>
		<link>http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubisoft DRM/Command &#38; Conquer 4 Updates&#8230;both online all the time &#124; DRM News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] it sounds like C&amp;C’s system bears quite a resemblance to Blizzard’s new iteration of Battle.net.     Posted in Games  Tags: Command &amp; Conquer 4, constant server access, EA, Ubisoft  &#171; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it sounds like C&amp;C’s system bears quite a resemblance to Blizzard’s new iteration of Battle.net.     Posted in Games  Tags: Command &amp; Conquer 4, constant server access, EA, Ubisoft  &laquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>So you have to be logged onto their server all the time even to play single-player?  SCREW THAT.  I wish people would just say no to these Draconian schemes to remake computer gaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you have to be logged onto their server all the time even to play single-player?  SCREW THAT.  I wish people would just say no to these Draconian schemes to remake computer gaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StarCraft 2 Cheats &#187; Blizzard announces Battle.Net to be required for Starcraft II &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>StarCraft 2 Cheats &#187; Blizzard announces Battle.Net to be required for Starcraft II &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedrmnews.com/games/blizzard-announces-battle-net-to-be-required-for-starcraft-ii-details-new-additions-to-system/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] View original post here: Blizzard announces Battle.Net to be required for Starcraft II &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View original post here: Blizzard announces Battle.Net to be required for Starcraft II &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
